Childbed Fever

Ignaz Semmelweis Scientific approach to the mystery of Childbed Fever The scientific method of research is defined as a careful, disciplined, synthetic substance search for knowledge around any(prenominal) and all aspects of the universe, obtained by tryout of the best available evidence and always field of observe to correction and improvement upon disco very of better evidence. The five go of the scientific method are: 1. Observation: observe about aspect of the universe. 2. Hypothesis: tentative description of the reflection or a operative assumption, if tentative description is consistent it thus becomes a possibility 3. Prediction: based upon the speculation 4. go about: psychometric test the farsightedness or further observation and specify you speculation if needed 5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until there are no discrepancies betwixt the guess/ possibleness and experiment and observation. Ignaz Semmelweis in stu death exertion febrility apply the scientific method of research in 1847. Semmelweis discover that between 600 and 800 women who had died each year from confinement fever had died in sectionalization 1 of the Vienne General Hospital. He withal observe that the design of terminals in Division II was one-tenth as many. That was Semmelweiss sign observation. Semmelweiss also made the fol confuseding observations: 1. when the hospital experienced roughshod pestilent of project fever no such pandemic was seen in the city of Vienna 2. home deliveries had a hold up-go mortality evaluate 3. homeless niggle too damnable to go to the hospital failed to contact labor movement fever by and by self-delivering in back alleys of the city 4. did not get under ones skin any relationship between weather and the number of women dying from childbed fever 5. if the delivery was especially traumatic the mother had a greater chance of coming down with childbed fever 6. observed a professor slice his riff during a n postmortem who a few days later became ve! ry seriously with sepsis (blood poisoning) ground upon all that he had observed Semmelweis hypothesized that the create of the death of the Professor and childbed fever was stiff particles. Semmelweis argued that the cadaver particles, though invisible but susceptible to smell, were transmitted to the young-bearing(prenominal) diligent when the doctors when they delivered babies aft(prenominal)ward performing an autopsy.         Semmelweis predicted that if the doctors cleanseed there manpower to the dependent on(p) where they could not smell the cadaver particles that they would not transmit them to the large(predicate) female and the pregnant female would not develop childbed fever. Based upon that prediction Semmelweis instituted a strict policy that everyone was to wash their hands until their skin was slippery and the smell of cadaver was gone. This test of Semmelweis prediction was successful. In the first year mortality judge dropped from 18.3 % to 1.2% in social class 1 and division 1.2 % had a swan of 1.3%. Semmelweis did not introduce his finding at that metre.         Semmelweis repeated his hypothesis in 1850 at St. Rochus Hospital in Pest where he had similar results. Again, Semmelweis did not publish his finding. Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1843 returned to the US later studying in Pairs. Holmes argued that the disease known as puerperal fever is so far contagious at to be frequently carried from persevering to patient by physicians or nurses. Whenever effectual precautions were taken the number of childbed fever cases decreased. However after Semmelweis left Vienna the hand washes stopped and the mortality pass judgment from childbed fever rose again into the teens.         Semmelweis in 1850 he presented his theory on childbed fever at the Viennese Medical Society.

The lecture and debate went well but Semmelweis snuff out did not write it up for publication. Had Semmelweis published at this age I count that his findings would train been lauded. In 1860 Semmelweis did finally publish his finding in a work titled, The Etiology, Concept, and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever. ostensibly the book was poorly written, presented large amounts of unprocessed data, made hybridize conclusions in indigestible prose.         The medical community was unwilling to have Semmelweis hypothesis for several(prenominal) reasons but I believe that the well-nigh grave reason was that the motility of the transmission of the cadaver to the patient was the doctor. restore are suppose to heal not endanger. Semmelweis was from Hungary and believed that that compete a role in his theories not being accepted. another(prenominal) area of extend to was the lack of information on what precisely the midwives did that was different in division II that was different from division I. In appendix there were other doctors in the filed that had working hypothesis of the cause of childbed fever. One such theory was the miasmatic theory, being caused by a noxious condition of the atmosphere. separate theories centered on microbes causing childbed fever.          Holmes theories I believe were more wide accepted and put into practice because he published as he worked. That allowed for others to follow his written terzetto and do the same. Holmes also well known, the sons of a Harvard divine. Holmes reputation grew and several others repeated his work. therefore in the end giving Semmelweis the denotation he deserve for his early work on childbed fever. If you want to get a full essay, ord! er it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay